Legislature(2009 - 2010)
2010-04-18 House Journal
Full Journal pdf2010-04-18 House Journal Page 2547 HB 369 Representative Johansen moved and asked unanimous consent that the House consider the Senate message (page 2544) on the following: CS FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 369(FIN) am "An Act relating to an in-state natural gas pipeline, the office of in-state gasline project manager, and the Joint In-State Gasline Development Team; requiring the development of an in-state natural gas pipeline plan, to be delivered to the legislature by July 1, 2011, that provides for a gasline that is operational by December 31, 2015; directing the Joint In-State Gasline Development Team to assume responsibilities under sec. 19, ch. 14, SLA 2009; requiring expedited review and action by state agencies or entities relating to the in-state natural gas pipeline project; and providing for an effective date." and SENATE CS FOR CS FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 369(FIN) "An Act relating to an in-state natural gas pipeline, the office of in-state gasline project coordinator, and the Joint In-State Gasline Development Team; requiring the development of an in-state natural gas pipeline plan, to be delivered to the legislature by July 1, 2011, that provides for a natural gas pipeline that is operational by December 31, 2015; directing the Joint In-State Gasline Development Team to assume responsibilities under sec. 19, ch. 14, SLA 2009; requiring expedited review and action by state agencies or entities relating to the in-state natural gas pipeline project; clarifying the purpose of the Alaska Natural Gas Development Authority; relating to definitions of certain terms that relate to a project that may be developed by the Alaska Natural Gas Development Authority; relating to an exemption from application of AS 38.35 for certain natural gas carriers; and providing for an effective date." (SCR 21 - title change resolution) There being no objection, it was so ordered. 2010-04-18 House Journal Page 2548 Representative Johansen moved that the House concur in the Senate amendment to CSHB 369(FIN) am, thus adopting SCS CSHB 369(FIN), and recommended that the members vote yes. The question being: "Shall the House concur in the Senate amendment to CSHB 369(FIN) am?" The roll was taken with the following result: SCS CSHB 369(FIN) Concur YEAS: 40 NAYS: 0 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Austerman, Buch, Chenault, Cissna, Crawford, Dahlstrom, Doogan, Edgmon, Fairclough, N.Foster, Gara, Gardner, Gatto, Gruenberg, Guttenberg, Harris, Hawker, Herron, Holmes, Johansen, Johnson, Joule, Kawasaki, Keller, Kelly, Kerttula, Lynn, Millett, Munoz, Neuman, Olson, Petersen, Ramras, Salmon, Seaton, Stoltze, Thomas, Tuck, P.Wilson, T.Wilson And so, the House concurred in the Senate amendment. The Chief Clerk notified the Senate. SCS CSHB 369(FIN) was referred to the Chief Clerk for enrollment.